I think the peer editing for the speech project is helpful for both the editor and the writer. The writer can get comments from peers than from sensei, which makes it less threatening. Also the writer can see if his/her speech can be well understood by classmates who are in the same level, and not sensei alone. For the editor, he/she can learn some good context, grammar usage, creativity, etc... from the writer, and from there improving his/her Japanese skills. This way of learning is more encouraging for students.
Some negative aspects about peer editing is that the editing can be incorrect or both the writer and editor make the same mistakes. But mistakes are inevitable in learning. Because the student's learning process and the improvement are more important than being correct and getting good grades, peer editing is a good method to use in education.
2007年11月29日木曜日
ともだちはてつだいました
投稿者 クイエン 時刻: 17:27
登録:
コメントの投稿 (Atom)
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿